{"id":4101,"date":"2026-10-01T01:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-01T01:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/?p=4101"},"modified":"2026-08-22T18:40:42","modified_gmt":"2026-08-22T18:40:42","slug":"dc-pv1-vs-dc-pv2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/dc-pv1-vs-dc-pv2\/","title":{"rendered":"DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2: What the Utilization Category Means for PV Isolator Selection"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Quick Takeaway<\/h2>\n<p>DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2 is a switching-duty decision, not a complete product-selection shortcut. Use the utilization category to ask whether the quoted PV DC isolator switch route matches the intended PV circuit arrangement, switching expectation, voltage\/current conditions, and destination-market documentation.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Confirm the utilization category on the exact model datasheet, drawing, certificate package, or manufacturer confirmation before locking the RFQ.<\/li>\n<li>Do not compare DC-PV1 and DC-PV2 without also checking maximum DC voltage\/current, pole arrangement, enclosure, mounting, cable entry, and required markings.<\/li>\n<li>Treat DC-PV2 as a closer engineering review trigger for more demanding PV switching assumptions, not as a universal upgrade for every build.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2 in one purchasing decision<\/h2>\n<p>Use DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2 as a switching-duty filter: it helps you decide which PV isolator route to investigate, but it does not approve a complete assembly by itself. The right choice remains exact-model and buyer-application dependent.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/dc-pv1-vs-dc-pv2-engineering-anatomy.webp\" alt=\"Technical anatomy view of an unbranded PV DC isolator switch showing relevant mounting and connection interfaces\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><figcaption>An exact drawing identifies the interfaces that must be controlled for the approved model route.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>What the utilization category can tell you<\/h3>\n<p>The category indicates the type of PV DC switching duty claimed for a device under stated conditions. For buyers, that means it belongs in the same review line as rated DC voltage, current, pole configuration, and the manufacturer\u2019s product documentation.<\/p>\n<p>As an evidence boundary, the <a href=\"https:\/\/webstore.iec.ch\/en\/publication\/107159\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IEC 60947-3 scope<\/a> describes the standard\u2019s scope as switches, disconnectors, switch-disconnectors and fuse-combination units within stated distribution- and motor-circuit AC\/DC limits. This article uses utilization category as a procurement and engineering decision point; it does not replace the current standard text, a model certificate, or the supplier\u2019s technical file.<\/p>\n<h3>What the category does not decide<\/h3>\n<p>The category does not tell you whether a specific enclosure, handle, cable entry, mounting method, destination-market marking, or accessory set is suitable. Those points depend on the exact model route, drawing, datasheet, certificate package, and the buyer\u2019s application.<\/p>\n<p>It also should not be used as a wiring guide. If the commercial question is \u201cwhich isolator route should we request,\u201d stay with utilization category and documentation; if the question is circuit layout, use the buyer\u2019s design rules and project standards.<\/p>\n<h2>The engineering difference: making and breaking PV DC current<\/h2>\n<p>The practical difference is the switching condition the product is being selected and documented for. DC-PV1 is typically investigated for defined PV DC switching duties under the product\u2019s stated limits, while DC-PV2 should be investigated when the PV architecture may create more demanding switching assumptions, such as array conditions that require closer review against the manufacturer\u2019s documentation.<\/p>\n<h3>DC-PV1 as a defined PV switching-duty route<\/h3>\n<p>For many OEM and panel-building discussions, DC-PV1 may be the first category checked when the isolator is expected to operate within a clearly defined PV circuit arrangement. The buyer still needs the exact voltage, current, pole arrangement, environmental, and documentation match.<\/p>\n<p>Do not assume that a DC-PV1 statement on one model applies to another housing, current size, pole configuration, or destination market. Confirm it against the current product data.<\/p>\n<h3>DC-PV2 as a closer review route<\/h3>\n<p>DC-PV2 should be treated as a signal to review more demanding PV switching duty assumptions before purchase. The practical question is not \u201cis DC-PV2 better,\u201d but \u201cdoes this application require the duty claimed under DC-PV2 on this exact model?\u201d<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Buyer question<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align: right;\">DC-PV1 investigation<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align: right;\">DC-PV2 investigation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Is the PV circuit arrangement simple and clearly defined?<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Often reviewed first<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Still possible, but may be more than needed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Are parallel strings, reverse-current assumptions, or array-level switching questions present?<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Requires caution and documentation review<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">More likely to be part of the review<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Can the supplier provide exact-model evidence?<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Required<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Required<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Does the category alone approve the isolator?<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">N\u00e3o<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">N\u00e3o<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Should price be compared before technical confirmation?<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Not recommended<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: right;\">Not recommended<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>When DC-PV1 may be the commercial route<\/h2>\n<p>DC-PV1 may be a suitable enquiry direction when the buyer\u2019s PV circuit duty is clearly defined and the requested model documentation supports the stated voltage, current, and configuration. The decision should be made from the actual datasheet and drawing, not from a family name alone.<\/p>\n<h3>OEM and panel-builder use cases to clarify<\/h3>\n<p>For PV equipment builders and panel builders, DC-PV1 may be investigated where the switch is specified for a known string or circuit arrangement and the operating assumptions are not being stretched beyond the documented product route. The buyer should state whether the isolator is inside an enclosure, supplied as a housed unit, or integrated into a larger assembly.<\/p>\n<p>If the project uses different current sizes, operator types, or pole combinations across variants, each variant should be checked. A category shown for one line item should not be copied across the bill of materials without confirmation.<\/p>\n<h3>DC-PV1 enquiry checklist<\/h3>\n<p>Use this checklist before accepting a DC-PV1 quotation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Confirm the exact model code, not only the product family.<\/li>\n<li>State maximum system DC voltage and operating current for the item.<\/li>\n<li>Confirm the pole arrangement and how the PV conductors are switched.<\/li>\n<li>Ask for the current datasheet and dimensional drawing.<\/li>\n<li>Confirm enclosure, mounting, and cable-entry requirements.<\/li>\n<li>State destination market and any required approval or marking.<\/li>\n<li>Verify whether the quoted category applies to the selected configuration.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For a first product-family review, start with the <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/dc-isolator-switches\/\">Faixa de chave do isolador PV DC<\/a> and then narrow the enquiry to the exact model route.<\/p>\n<h2>When DC-PV2 should be investigated before RFQ lock<\/h2>\n<p>DC-PV2 should be investigated before RFQ lock when the PV circuit arrangement or buyer specification suggests a more demanding PV switching-duty review. This is especially important when the purchasing team is comparing offers from suppliers that quote category labels without the same level of supporting documentation.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/dc-pv1-vs-dc-pv2-verification-check.webp\" alt=\"Unbranded PV DC isolator switch sample at a quality-control inspection bench with non-readable drawing and measuring tools\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><figcaption>Sample review should connect the exact item to its current drawing and requested evidence package.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>Switching-duty assumptions to confirm<\/h3>\n<p>Ask the design team whether the isolator is expected to operate only within a defined string condition, or whether the array architecture introduces parallel-source, reverse-current, or other switching assumptions that need to be reviewed. The supplier should confirm the category against the selected model and configuration.<\/p>\n<p>If the answer is unclear, do not resolve the uncertainty by buying the highest-looking label. Resolve it by documenting the actual voltage, current, circuit arrangement, and intended switching role.<\/p>\n<h3>Procurement risks if category is not confirmed<\/h3>\n<p>The commercial risk is not only technical mismatch. It can also include quotation delays, drawing revisions, destination-market documentation gaps, and last-stage substitution when the selected route does not match the requested marking or configuration.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>RFQ situation<\/th>\n<th>Risk if ignored<\/th>\n<th>Buyer action<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Supplier quotes \u201cDC-PV2\u201d without model detail<\/td>\n<td>Category may not apply to the selected configuration<\/td>\n<td>Request exact model code and supporting documents<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Drawing does not show pole arrangement<\/td>\n<td>Wiring and switching assumptions may be unclear<\/td>\n<td>Request updated drawing or configuration sheet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Destination market is not stated<\/td>\n<td>Required marking package may be missed<\/td>\n<td>State country\/region and approval requirement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Enclosure is chosen after switch selection<\/td>\n<td>Cut-out, handle, and cable-entry fit may change<\/td>\n<td>Confirm mechanical route before purchase<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Current or voltage is rounded in the RFQ<\/td>\n<td>Offer may be based on the wrong rating line<\/td>\n<td>Provide maximum design values<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Pole arrangement, voltage, and current: do not compare category in isolation<\/h2>\n<p>Do not select between DC-PV1 and DC-PV2 without checking pole arrangement, voltage, and current on the exact product documentation. The utilization category is only one part of the selection evidence.<\/p>\n<h3>Voltage and pole configuration<\/h3>\n<p>PV DC voltage and pole arrangement are linked in the isolator selection. A product route may require a specific number of poles, switching path, or connection arrangement to match a stated DC voltage and category.<\/p>\n<p>Ask for a drawing that shows the selected configuration. If the drawing is generic, request confirmation that it applies to the quoted model and the intended PV circuit arrangement.<\/p>\n<h3>Current, enclosure, and environment<\/h3>\n<p>Current ratings can be affected by the exact model and installation conditions stated by the manufacturer. Enclosure type, ambient assumptions, cable entry, and installation layout should be reviewed using the supplier\u2019s documentation rather than assumed from a catalog heading.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/dc-pv1-vs-dc-pv2-application-context.webp\" alt=\"Unbranded PV DC isolator switch used in a realistic industrial application context\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><figcaption>Installation conditions change the product-route and document questions a buyer must resolve.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Selection parameter<\/th>\n<th>Why it matters commercially<\/th>\n<th>Evidence to request<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Tens\u00e3o m\u00e1xima CC<\/td>\n<td>Drives model and pole-route review<\/td>\n<td>Datasheet and configuration confirmation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Maximum DC current<\/td>\n<td>Affects size and selected rating line<\/td>\n<td>Datasheet for exact model<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Arranjo de polos<\/td>\n<td>Determines the switching path<\/td>\n<td>Drawing or wiring\/configuration sheet<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Enclosure or open mounting<\/td>\n<td>Changes mechanical and environmental assumptions<\/td>\n<td>Product drawing and enclosure details<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Cable entry direction and size<\/td>\n<td>Affects build layout and installation fit<\/td>\n<td>Drawing and bill-of-material confirmation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Mercado de destino<\/td>\n<td>May change requested markings or certificate package<\/td>\n<td>Current certificate or declaration package, where applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Model-route comparison for Shieldhz PV isolator selection<\/h2>\n<p>Choose the Shieldhz model route only after the application duty and documentation package are clear. A family page helps you start the enquiry, but the final decision depends on the selected model, configuration, and buyer requirements.<\/p>\n<h3>Start with the product route, then narrow the evidence<\/h3>\n<p>If the project has not yet fixed the current size, enclosure style, or mounting method, begin by reviewing candidate PV isolator routes. From there, request the exact drawing and documentation for the selected configuration.<\/p>\n<p>O <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/dc-isolator-switches\/gf40-pv-dc-isolator-switch\/\">GF40 PV DC isolator switch route<\/a> can be used as one model-route enquiry path when its documented configuration appears to match the buyer\u2019s PV isolator requirements. The <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/dc-isolator-switches\/gf51-pv-dc-isolator-switch\/\">GF51 PV DC isolator switch route<\/a> e <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/dc-isolator-switches\/gf41-solar-dc-switch\/\">GF41 solar DC switch route<\/a> should be reviewed the same way: by exact model, selected configuration, and current documentation.<\/p>\n<h3>Model-route decision table<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Buyer scenario<\/th>\n<th>What to do before quotation<\/th>\n<th>What not to assume<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>New PV equipment platform<\/td>\n<td>Shortlist model routes against voltage\/current and mounting<\/td>\n<td>Do not assume one route fits all platform variants<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Replacement sourcing<\/td>\n<td>Match the existing functional and mechanical requirements<\/td>\n<td>Do not copy a category label without documents<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Distributor stock planning<\/td>\n<td>Separate common demand from application-specific approvals<\/td>\n<td>Do not treat one certificate package as universal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Panel-builder project<\/td>\n<td>Confirm cut-out, handle position, cable entry, and drawing<\/td>\n<td>Do not wait until assembly to check fit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Export build<\/td>\n<td>State destination market at RFQ stage<\/td>\n<td>Do not assume markings are identical across markets<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>How Shieldhz confirms a PV DC isolator switch route<\/h2>\n<p>Shieldhz confirms a PV DC isolator switch route by matching the buyer\u2019s application inputs to current product documentation before quotation. Final suitability is confirmed against current product documentation and the buyer\u2019s application.<\/p>\n<h3>Pre-quotation inputs to provide<\/h3>\n<p>A useful enquiry gives the supplier enough information to confirm the model route without guessing. Include the following items in the first RFQ message when possible:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Application and destination market.<\/li>\n<li>Maximum DC voltage and maximum DC current.<\/li>\n<li>String, array, or pole arrangement to be switched.<\/li>\n<li>Enclosure and environment assumptions.<\/li>\n<li>Mounting method and cable-entry requirement.<\/li>\n<li>Requested drawing, datasheet, and certificate package.<\/li>\n<li>Any required approval, label, or marking requirement.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/dc-pv1-vs-dc-pv2-supply-handover.webp\" alt=\"Unbranded PV DC isolator switch sample, document folder and protective export packing prepared for handover\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><figcaption>Documentation control, sample acceptance and protective packing are separate handover checks.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>Documentation package to request<\/h3>\n<p>The documentation package should correspond to the exact model and selected configuration. A datasheet alone may not answer mechanical fit, destination-market marking, or category confirmation questions.<\/p>\n<p>Use o <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/pv-dc-isolator-manufacturer-documents\/\">PV DC isolator documentation checklist<\/a> to structure the buyer-side document request. For time-sensitive quotations, identify which documents are needed for engineering approval and which are needed for purchasing release.<\/p>\n<h3>Buyer-verification action list<\/h3>\n<p>Before approving the quoted route, check:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The model code matches the quotation, drawing, and datasheet.<\/li>\n<li>The stated utilization category applies to the selected configuration.<\/li>\n<li>The voltage\/current line matches the application maximums.<\/li>\n<li>The drawing matches mounting, handle orientation, and cable entry.<\/li>\n<li>The certificate or declaration package matches the destination-market request, where applicable.<\/li>\n<li>Any required marking is stated in writing before purchase.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Commercial RFQ wording that prevents category mismatch<\/h2>\n<p>Write the RFQ so the supplier must confirm the utilization category against the exact model and application, not merely quote a product family. This reduces back-and-forth and helps engineering, purchasing, and distribution teams compare offers on the same basis.<\/p>\n<h3>Minimum RFQ wording<\/h3>\n<p>Use concise wording that ties category to configuration:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Please quote a PV DC isolator switch route for the following application. Confirm whether the selected exact model and configuration are documented for DC-PV1, DC-PV2, or another stated category under the supplied voltage, current, pole arrangement, enclosure, mounting, cable-entry, and destination-market requirements. Provide the current datasheet, drawing, and requested certificate or declaration package.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This wording avoids treating DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2 as a standalone price label. It also makes it easier for the supplier to respond with a route that can be checked by engineering.<\/p>\n<h3>Evaluation checklist for procurement teams<\/h3>\n<p>When comparing offers, check the evidence line by line:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Does each supplier quote an exact model code?<\/li>\n<li>Is the utilization category stated for the selected configuration?<\/li>\n<li>Are voltage and current values shown in the same way across offers?<\/li>\n<li>Is the pole arrangement documented?<\/li>\n<li>Are enclosure, mounting, and cable entry included?<\/li>\n<li>Is the destination-market documentation package identified?<\/li>\n<li>Are exclusions or assumptions clearly written?<\/li>\n<li>Has engineering approved the documentation before purchasing release?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>How to compare quotations without overbuying or underspecifying<\/h2>\n<p>Compare quotations by documented fit, not by category label alone. DC-PV2 may be necessary for some applications, while DC-PV1 may be the appropriate route for others when supported by the exact product documentation and application data.<\/p>\n<h3>Technical-to-commercial comparison<\/h3>\n<p>A fair comparison starts with identical inputs. If one quotation is based on complete voltage, current, pole, enclosure, and market information while another is based on a generic request, the prices are not technically comparable.<\/p>\n<p>Ask suppliers to state any assumptions. If an offer is cheaper because it excludes a required marking, enclosure detail, or drawing package, that difference should be visible before purchasing approval.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision table for quotation review<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Comparison point<\/th>\n<th>Acceptable buyer evidence<\/th>\n<th>Escalate if<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Category confirmation<\/td>\n<td>Exact model and configuration are stated<\/td>\n<td>Only a family category is shown<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tens\u00e3o\/corrente<\/td>\n<td>Values match the RFQ maximums<\/td>\n<td>Values are missing, rounded, or lower than required<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Mechanical fit<\/td>\n<td>Drawing matches the assembly need<\/td>\n<td>Drawing is generic or not supplied<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Documenta\u00e7\u00e3o<\/td>\n<td>Requested package is listed<\/td>\n<td>Certificate or declaration scope is unclear<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Mercado de destino<\/td>\n<td>Market and marking request are acknowledged<\/td>\n<td>Supplier assumes a default market<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Substitution control<\/td>\n<td>Alternative route is clearly identified<\/td>\n<td>Supplier changes model without written confirmation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2 is a practical way to narrow PV DC isolator switch selection, but it is not a complete approval method. The category should be reviewed together with maximum DC voltage\/current, pole arrangement, enclosure, mounting, cable entry, destination market, and the exact documentation package.<\/p>\n<p>For commercial teams, the best result comes from a clear RFQ and a documented model-route confirmation. For engineering teams, the key is to verify the utilization category against the current datasheet, drawing, certificate package, and the buyer\u2019s actual PV application before release.<\/p>\n<h2>Perguntas frequentes<\/h2>\n<h3>What is the main difference in DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2 for buyers?<\/h3>\n<p>The main difference is the PV DC switching-duty condition being claimed for the device under stated documentation. Buyers should treat the category as a technical filter that must be checked against the exact model, configuration, and application.<\/p>\n<h3>Is DC-PV2 always the better choice?<\/h3>\n<p>No. DC-PV2 may be the correct route for some applications, but it is not a universal upgrade. The correct selection depends on the PV circuit arrangement, voltage\/current, model documentation, and destination-market requirements.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I approve a PV isolator using utilization category alone?<\/h3>\n<p>No. Utilization category should be checked with the datasheet, drawing, model code, pole arrangement, enclosure details, and required documentation package. Final approval is application and exact-model dependent.<\/p>\n<h3>What should procurement ask for when a supplier quotes DC-PV1 or DC-PV2?<\/h3>\n<p>Ask for the exact model code, configuration, current datasheet, dimensional drawing, category confirmation, and any requested certificate or declaration package. Also state the destination market and required marking before accepting the quotation.<\/p>\n<h3>Does the PV utilization category cover separate fault-current or fusing decisions?<\/h3>\n<p>No. A PV isolator switch should be selected for its documented switching and isolation role. Any separate fusing or other design requirements should be specified and verified separately by the buyer\u2019s engineering process.<\/p>\n<h3>Why does the destination market matter when selecting between DC-PV1 and DC-PV2?<\/h3>\n<p>Destination market can affect the requested markings, document package, and buyer approval route. Do not assume that one quotation package satisfies every market; confirm the requirement in the RFQ and verify it against current product documentation.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Use a practical buyer checklist to evaluate DC-PV1 vs DC-PV2 inputs, documentation, approval controls and the exact PV DC isolator switch route.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4096,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_gspb_post_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4101","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pv-dc-isolator-switches"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":7}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4101","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4101"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4101\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4102,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4101\/revisions\/4102"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4096"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4101"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4101"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4101"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}