{"id":3327,"date":"2026-07-12T01:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-12T01:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/iec-60947-vs-ul-508a\/"},"modified":"2026-06-23T09:53:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T09:53:00","slug":"iec-60947-vs-ul-508a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/iec-60947-vs-ul-508a\/","title":{"rendered":"IEC 60947 vs UL 508A: Component and Panel Scope"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you are comparing IEC 60947 vs UL 508A, the short answer is this: IEC 60947 is mainly a component standard family for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear, while UL 508A is a panel standard for the finished industrial control panel assembly. Buyers should not treat them as interchangeable. If you are sourcing a control component, disconnect, selector switch, or similar device, you usually start with the applicable IEC component standard. If you are buying a complete panel for the U.S. market, UL 508A often becomes the key assembly requirement. Good purchasing decisions come from matching the device function, the destination market, and the documentation route before the BOM is frozen.<\/p>\n<p>Industrial control buyers often run into confusion because IEC 60947 and UL 508A appear in the same project documents, yet they do not answer the same question. One helps define whether a component is suitable for its switching duty. The other helps determine whether the completed panel can be built, marked, and accepted as an assembly.<\/p>\n<p>That difference matters for OEMs, panel builders, maintenance teams, and procurement managers. It affects part selection, drawing review, enclosure layout, short-circuit considerations, labeling, and site acceptance risk. It also affects whether a &#8220;compliant&#8221; component can actually be used without rework inside the final control panel.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"IEC 60947 vs UL 508A: What Industrial Control Buyers Should Understand concept diagram\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/iec-60947-vs-ul-508a-concept-01-v2.webp\"\/><figcaption>Figure 1. Core concept behind IEC 60947 vs UL 508A selection.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Related Shieldhz references: <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/push-buttons\/\">\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u043a\u043d\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432\u044b\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0439<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/industrial-control-component-guide\/\">control component selection guide<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/what-is-push-button-switch\/\">\u041e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u044b \u043a\u043d\u043e\u043f\u043e\u0447\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432\u044b\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0439<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/what-is-dc-switch-disconnector\/\">DC switch disconnector overview<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>For the UL panel side, use the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ul.com\/resources\/ul-508a-third-edition-summary-requirements\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">UL 508A summary from UL Solutions<\/a> as the external reference. UL 508A is a panel construction\/listing framework and does not replace component datasheets or certificates.<\/p>\n<h2>IEC 60947 vs UL 508A: The Core Difference in Scope<\/h2>\n<p>The easiest way to understand IEC 60947 vs UL 508A is to separate component scope from assembly scope.<\/p>\n<p>IEC 60947 is a family of standards for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear. Different parts of the family apply to different product types. In buyer terms, IEC 60947 helps answer questions such as:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Is this switch designed for the duty I need?<\/li>\n<li>What utilization category applies?<\/li>\n<li>What is the rated operational voltage for this product type?<\/li>\n<li>Is the device intended for isolation, motor duty, control duty, or another switching role?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>UL 508A, by contrast, applies to the finished industrial control panel. It is about how components are used together in the enclosure and how the assembly is constructed, documented, marked, and evaluated for the target market.<\/p>\n<p>That is why the same project may require both paths of review:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Component review under the relevant IEC standard<\/li>\n<li>Panel review under UL 508A for the finished assembly<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For practical sourcing, that means a control component can be suitable under an IEC device standard, while the panel builder still must verify whether that exact device fits the panel compliance route.<\/p>\n<h2>Where IEC 60947 component standard Fits for Switches and Isolators<\/h2>\n<p>When the product under discussion is a switch-disconnector, isolator, or rotary switch used for power switching, the most relevant part is often IEC 60947 component standard.<\/p>\n<p>IEC 60947 component standard:2020+AMD1:2025 applies to switches, disconnectors, switch-disconnectors, and fuse-combination units for distribution and motor circuits, with rated voltage up to 1000 V AC or 1500 V DC.<\/p>\n<p>This is important for buyers of control component products because many inquiries are not just about &#8220;current&#8221; or &#8220;voltage&#8221; in a general sense. They are about function and duty:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Main isolating<\/li>\n<li>Changeover switching<\/li>\n<li>Motor circuit switching<\/li>\n<li>Distribution switching<\/li>\n<li>Maintenance disconnecting<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A buyer should avoid assuming that any switch with a printed ampere value is equally suitable for all of those roles. A device can be appropriate for one utilization category and not for another. This is why it helps to review the applicable control-device standard context and verify the datasheet against the actual circuit.<\/p>\n<p>UL 508A does not replace this step. It does not tell you whether a switch is the right switching device for the duty. It tells you how the final panel must be built and evaluated as an assembly.<\/p>\n<h2>Why Buyers Get Tripped Up<\/h2>\n<p>The confusion usually starts when procurement sees multiple compliance references on one RFQ. A machine builder may specify a switch to IEC 60947, while the final panel is expected to meet UL 508A for a North American installation. If the buyer treats those as alternatives instead of parallel requirements, several issues can follow:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The wrong switch type is approved<\/li>\n<li>The contact program does not match the wiring diagram<\/li>\n<li>The door-mounted operator hardware does not fit the enclosure<\/li>\n<li>The documentation package is incomplete for the panel builder<\/li>\n<li>Panel acceptance is delayed because component evidence and assembly evidence do not align<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This is common in projects using selector switches, isolators, and multi-position cam switches because the product may look simple, but the application details are not. Contact sequence, pole arrangement, utilization category, mounting route, and enclosure environment all affect whether the part is actually usable.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"IEC 60947 vs UL 508A: What Industrial Control Buyers Should Understand selection checks\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/iec-60947-vs-ul-508a-selection-checks-02-v2.webp\"\/><figcaption>Figure 2. Selection checks should connect standard scope, utilization category, certificate scope, test evidence, datasheet values, and documentation.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>A Practical Comparison for Industrial Control Buyers<\/h2>\n<p>The table below frames IEC 60947 vs UL 508A in buyer language.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Buyer question<\/th>\n<th>IEC 60947 focus<\/th>\n<th>UL 508A focus<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>What does it cover?<\/td>\n<td>The component and its performance by product type<\/td>\n<td>The complete industrial control panel assembly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>What are typical examples?<\/td>\n<td>Switches, disconnectors, switch-disconnectors, contactors, control devices<\/td>\n<td>Enclosure, wiring, spacing, marking, component application, panel rating path<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>What decision does it support?<\/td>\n<td>Whether the device fits the electrical duty<\/td>\n<td>Whether the assembled panel can be built and accepted<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>What documents matter first?<\/td>\n<td>Datasheet, applicable standard part, utilization category, wiring\/contact chart<\/td>\n<td>Panel BOM, layout, marking data, assembly documentation, short-circuit evaluation route<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Where is it most visible?<\/td>\n<td>Product selection<\/td>\n<td>Panel construction and market acceptance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common buyer mistake<\/td>\n<td>Matching only current and voltage<\/td>\n<td>Assuming compliant parts automatically make a compliant panel<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>For a complete industrial control panel headed to the U.S. market, UL 508A often drives final assembly acceptance. For an individual control component or changeover switch, the IEC device route often drives product suitability.<\/p>\n<p>That is why experienced buyers review both the component standard and the panel requirement before releasing the order.<\/p>\n<h2>How This Affects Rotary Cam Switch Purchasing<\/h2>\n<p>The topic becomes especially relevant in the control component category. A cam switch can be used for on-off control, phase selection, motor duty, instrument switching, or changeover functions. Different contact programs and switching sequences may exist within the same family.<\/p>\n<p>If you are sourcing from a push button selection reference, the useful questions are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What is the exact switching function?<\/li>\n<li>Is the product being used as a control device or power switching device?<\/li>\n<li>Which utilization category is required by the application?<\/li>\n<li>How many poles and positions are needed?<\/li>\n<li>Does the contact table match the circuit logic?<\/li>\n<li>Is it panel-mounted, door-coupled, enclosed, or open type?<\/li>\n<li>What documentation must accompany the shipment?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For example, a buyer comparing an SH-B2 push button route to another family should not compare only faceplate appearance or headline rating. The internal contact program, handle position sequence, shaft arrangement, and terminal layout may determine whether the switch can be wired as intended.<\/p>\n<p>If the switching function is not fully clear, a technical primer such as GQ metal push button route can help non-design stakeholders understand why contact sequence matters so much.<\/p>\n<h2>The Real Procurement Questions to Ask<\/h2>\n<p>In practical terms, industrial buyers should use IEC 60947 vs UL 508A to organize their due diligence, not to create a false choice between standards.<\/p>\n<h3>If you are buying a component<\/h3>\n<p>Focus first on whether the device fits the application.<\/p>\n<p>Check:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Device type<\/li>\n<li>Intended switching duty<\/li>\n<li>Rated operational voltage and current as stated for the relevant use case<\/li>\n<li>\u041a\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0433\u043e\u0440\u0438\u044f \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f<\/li>\n<li>Number of poles and positions<\/li>\n<li>Wiring diagram and contact chart<\/li>\n<li>Mounting and mechanical interface<\/li>\n<li>Required enclosure or environmental protection level if applicable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This is particularly important for products used as isolators or transfer devices. If the application involves source selection or line changeover, the buyer should also confirm the switching logic against the intended function described in selector switch reference.<\/p>\n<h3>If you are buying a finished panel<\/h3>\n<p>Focus on the assembly route.<\/p>\n<p>Check:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u0420\u044b\u043d\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430\u0437\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f<\/li>\n<li>Panel builder documentation<\/li>\n<li>Component acceptability within the assembly<\/li>\n<li>Nameplate and marking requirements<\/li>\n<li>Assembly layout and spacing<\/li>\n<li>Short-circuit current rating route<\/li>\n<li>Enclosure and environmental requirements<\/li>\n<li>Final document package needed for acceptance<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A component with sound IEC documentation may still create problems if the panel builder cannot apply it correctly within the assembly design or documentation route.<\/p>\n<h3>If you are buying for export<\/h3>\n<p>This is where many mixed-standard projects live. In export work, buyers should ask two separate but linked questions:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>What standard governs the product itself?<\/li>\n<li>What standard governs the final panel in the destination market?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>That simple split prevents many late-stage approval issues.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"IEC 60947 vs UL 508A: What Industrial Control Buyers Should Understand application and wiring context\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/iec-60947-vs-ul-508a-application-wiring-03-v2.webp\"\/><figcaption>\u0420\u0438\u0441\u0443\u043d\u043e\u043a 3. \u041f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0447\u0435\u0439 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u044f\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0435\u043e\u0431\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u043e \u0441\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0442 \u043f\u043e\u0434\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0441 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044f.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Datasheet Checks That Add Real E-E-A-T to the Purchase Decision<\/h2>\n<p>Good technical buying is not about collecting logos. It is about matching evidence to the exact part number and exact use case.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the most useful checks for engineers and buyers comparing IEC 60947 vs UL 508A in real projects.<\/p>\n<h3>1. Verify the exact model route<\/h3>\n<p>Do not approve a family name only. Verify the exact model, poles, positions, operator type, mounting form, and enclosure form if any. Variants within one family may differ significantly.<\/p>\n<h3>2. Match the contact program to the circuit<\/h3>\n<p>This is critical for cam switches. The faceplate position labels may look correct while the internal contact sequence is wrong for the circuit. Always request or verify:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Contact table<\/li>\n<li>Position sequence<\/li>\n<li>\u042d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0430<\/li>\n<li>Break-before-make or other switching behavior if relevant to the application<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>3. Confirm utilization category, not just ampere value<\/h3>\n<p>A number on the catalog page is not enough. The application may involve isolation, motor duty, resistive duty, or another defined use case. Ask for datasheet language tied to the intended function.<\/p>\n<h3>4. Check mechanical fit early<\/h3>\n<p>Late-stage panel issues often have nothing to do with the electrical rating. They come from:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Panel cutout mismatch<\/li>\n<li>Door-coupling length mismatch<\/li>\n<li>Handle depth mismatch<\/li>\n<li>Shaft arrangement mismatch<\/li>\n<li>Terminal access conflicts<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These should be reviewed from drawings before PO release.<\/p>\n<h3>5. Align the documentation package with the project need<\/h3>\n<p>A buyer may require some or all of the following depending on the job:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u0418\u043d\u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0430\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442<\/li>\n<li>Technical drawing<\/li>\n<li>\u042d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0441\u0445\u0435\u043c\u0430<\/li>\n<li>Contact program chart<\/li>\n<li>Certificate or declaration package<\/li>\n<li>Marking details<\/li>\n<li>Packing identification tied to the part number<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>6. Separate component suitability from panel suitability<\/h3>\n<p>This is the key lesson of IEC 60947 vs UL 508A. A component can be technically right and still be the wrong choice for the panel approval route if the documentation or application path is incomplete.<\/p>\n<h2>Common Risk Areas in Mixed IEC and UL Projects<\/h2>\n<p>The following risk areas appear again and again in industrial control procurement:<\/p>\n<h3>Misreading &#8220;equivalent&#8221; products<\/h3>\n<p>A buyer may substitute one switch for another based on current, voltage, and size. That can fail if the contact table, duty category, or operator arrangement differs.<\/p>\n<h3>Incomplete RFQ details<\/h3>\n<p>If the RFQ says only &#8220;3 position switch&#8221; or &#8220;main disconnect,&#8221; the supplier may quote a product family without enough application detail. That increases the chance of mismatch.<\/p>\n<h3>Assuming all documents apply to all variants<\/h3>\n<p>Family brochures are useful, but final approval should rely on the exact model route, exact drawing, and exact documentation set tied to the ordered configuration.<\/p>\n<h3>Treating panel compliance as a component issue<\/h3>\n<p>UL 508A is not solved by one component document. It depends on the whole assembly path.<\/p>\n<h3>Treating component compliance as a panel issue<\/h3>\n<p>The opposite error also happens. A panel requirement does not remove the need to confirm whether the device itself is suitable for the actual switching duty.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"IEC 60947 vs UL 508A: What Industrial Control Buyers Should Understand procurement checklist\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/iec-60947-vs-ul-508a-procurement-checklist-04-v2.webp\"\/><figcaption>\u0420\u0438\u0441\u0443\u043d\u043e\u043a 4. \u041f\u043e\u043b\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 \u0434\u043e\u043b\u0436\u0435\u043d \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0430\u0442\u044c \u043d\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b, \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0432, \u043c\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0436, \u043a\u043e\u0440\u043f\u0443\u0441 \u0438 \u0442\u0440\u0435\u0431\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043a \u0434\u043e\u043a\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u043c.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>How Shieldhz Confirms Standard and Application Fit Before Quotation<\/h2>\n<p>Shieldhz is the export brand of Zhejiang Shihe Electric Co., Ltd. Founded in 2014 in the Zhejiang, Wenzhou, Yueqing industrial context, the company operates a manufacturing base of more than 5,000 m2 with 100+ employees and 40+ machines. Relevant company systems and product documentation may involve ISO9001, RoHS, CE, TUV, UL, UKCA, CCC, and CB depending on the product route and requested package.<\/p>\n<p>For IEC 60947 vs UL 508A inquiries related to control component sourcing, Shieldhz focuses first on technical confirmation rather than broad family quoting. The review typically centers on the exact buyer inputs needed to avoid mismatch between component selection and panel use.<\/p>\n<h3>What Shieldhz checks for this topic<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Requested model route and product family<\/li>\n<li>Rated application and utilization category needed for the switching duty<\/li>\n<li>Contact program or contact table for the required positions<\/li>\n<li>Wiring diagram against the buyer&#8217;s circuit logic<\/li>\n<li>Datasheet and technical drawing for the quoted configuration<\/li>\n<li>Mounting style, door-coupling needs, and enclosure or IP requirement<\/li>\n<li>Documentation package requested by the buyer<\/li>\n<li>Whether the device is being purchased as a standalone component or for integration into a panel with additional market-specific requirements<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This matters because a control component order is often not just a catalog selection. It may involve a defined switching sequence, a door-mounted operator arrangement, a drawing-controlled panel cutout, or a buyer-side compliance file.<\/p>\n<p>For that reason, sending the inquiry with the circuit diagram, contact function, target voltage class, mounting requirement, and documentation request usually leads to a more accurate quotation than sending a part description alone.<\/p>\n<p>Buyers who want a formal standards reference for the switch side can also review the official IEC publication for IEC 60947 component standard.<\/p>\n<h2>What a Strong Buyer Checklist Looks Like<\/h2>\n<p>Before approving a component or assembly, use this short checklist:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Identify whether you are buying a component or a finished panel<\/li>\n<li>Confirm the destination market<\/li>\n<li>Match the switch function to the actual application<\/li>\n<li>Verify the relevant datasheet and drawing for the exact model<\/li>\n<li>Check the contact chart and wiring diagram<\/li>\n<li>Confirm enclosure and mounting requirements<\/li>\n<li>Request the documentation package needed by engineering and procurement<\/li>\n<li>For panel work, confirm the panel compliance route separately from the device standard<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This checklist is especially useful for OEM buyers managing parallel approvals across engineering, sourcing, and panel fabrication.<\/p>\n<h2>\u0427\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b<\/h2>\n<h3>Is IEC 60947 the same as UL 508A?<\/h3>\n<p>No. IEC 60947 is a component standard family for low-voltage switchgear and controlgear. UL 508A applies to the finished industrial control panel assembly. They address different levels of the product and are not direct substitutes.<\/p>\n<h3>Which one matters more when buying a control component?<\/h3>\n<p>For the switch itself, the applicable IEC device standard and datasheet usually matter first. If that switch will be installed in a panel for a market requiring UL 508A, the panel builder must still evaluate the assembly route separately.<\/p>\n<h3>Does IEC 60947 component standard apply to all control panel switches?<\/h3>\n<p>Not all of them. IEC 60947 component standard is specifically relevant to switches, disconnectors, switch-disconnectors, and fuse-combination units for distribution and motor circuits within its scope. Other devices may fall under other parts of the IEC 60947 family.<\/p>\n<h3>Can a component with IEC documentation be used in a UL 508A panel?<\/h3>\n<p>It may be possible, but that does not happen automatically. The panel builder still needs to determine whether the component fits the assembly design, documentation route, and acceptance requirements for the final panel.<\/p>\n<h3>What should buyers request before approving a cam switch order?<\/h3>\n<p>Request the exact datasheet, wiring diagram, contact program or contact table, technical drawing, and documentation package tied to the quoted model. For door-mounted applications, also confirm mounting and operator details early.<\/p>\n<h3>Why is contact-chart verification so important for multi-position switches?<\/h3>\n<p>Because the visible handle positions do not by themselves prove the internal switching sequence. A mismatch between the contact chart and the circuit can cause incorrect operation even when the product size and rating appear correct.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the most common mistake in IEC 60947 vs UL 508A procurement?<\/h3>\n<p>The most common mistake is treating the standards as alternatives. In many real projects, one standard helps qualify the component and the other helps qualify the finished panel. Buyers need to review both at the correct stage.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IEC 60947 and UL 508A are often mixed up because both appear in panel projects. One mainly addresses components, the other panel assemblies.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3322,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_gspb_post_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3327","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industrial-control-components"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3327"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3327\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3633,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3327\/revisions\/3633"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3327"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shieldhz.com\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}